GANISM HERESIES
PREVIOUSLY EXPOSED:
Prehistoric Man,
sexual reproduction, Serpent & Serpent Seed, Polygamy, Marriage &
Divorce
CHAPTER TEN
Heretical Article No. 371:
“There existed prehistoric man.”
Quote
Richard Gan: “Perhaps the serpent was like prehistoric
man, maybe better looking, who existed long before modern man- the present
Adamic race – was created some 6,000 years ago.” (The Original Sin page 14).
E.O.D.H.
Answer:
Quote
W.M.B.: E-63 I can’t
believe scientists that women, when they was a ugly looking thing, and whatever
they was with men with hair out his nose like that and look a prehistoric
animal. I believe that when God woke Adam up to look at Eve, she was the most beautiful thing that eyes had
ever looked at. (Life Story 50-0820A).
Quote:
E-18 That’s the kind of a
thought that a man without Christ can think of God’s creation. But a man that’s
ever borned again knows that God does
nothing imperfect. He does all things well. (Reconciliation Through
Fellowship 56-0120).
Quote: E-62 A picture there that some Grecian artist
had painted of the creation…And there was Adam with hairs out of his nose, way
out like that, and looked like some kind of a prehistoric giant. No such
a thing as that. Anybody would do that has got a diluted mind, a perverted
mind. They don’t know God. (Reconciliation Through Fellowship 56-0120).
Quote:
E-5 A Greek artist had painted the conception
of Adam and Eve in the garden of Eden. Eve looked like some kind of a prehistoric animal…I couldn’t think the
Holy Spirit ever producing something like that. (Perseverant 62-0719E).
Quote:
8-7 God was so satisfied, and He rested
from all His works at the seventh day, and hallowed after He’d been six
thousand years in molding it. The great paradises of God, and the great dinosaurs, and no harm in
them, they were just as gentle as a little kitten.” (Satan’s
God created man (Adam) in his image. There was no other man before
him. (Gen. 1:26-27). There could not have been any man like beast or
dinosaurs roaming the earth before Adam and Bible creation in Genesis, because
the earth was without form and void. The Prophet stated in the above quotation
that dinosaurs existed after the creation in Genesis. He did not believe in any
man like beast before Adam, neither does the Scripture support it. The
perfection of God would not have allowed Him to make such a creature. It takes
a man without Christ and not born again
to invent such a heresy. It appears that Mr. Gan has more confidence in the
words of unbelieving scientists than the
Messenger that God sent upon the face of the earth.
The list of heresies that follows are offsprings of his Seventh
Seal/Seven Thunders program.
Heretical Article No. 372:
Richard
Gan: “The church is built upon twelve foundations. (I Corinthians 3:11, Ephesians 2:20) I will not say much on
this topic.”
E.O.D.H. Answer: It is not that he will not say much on
this topic; but he cannot say any more. He has run out of heresies and
perversions of the Scripture. The very Scriptures that he quoted defeated him.
“Foundation of the apostles;” its one
foundation of many apostles. Jesus said, “Upon this rock I will build my church.” For other foundation (singular) can no man lay than that is
laid, which is Jesus Christ (I Corinthians
I will add a little more humor here. He said I should take the
Bible only and preach it. That exempts the Messenger for each Age. That’s the
plan he applied, which resulted in his foolishness. I preach both. The Word
came to Malachi 4:5-6. Science spoke of prehistoric man. He has no Word to
fight. You can see where his foundation is laid; in science and Mendel’s law.
He said that, “I believe that Adam was to till the ground by his hand.” I only
quoted the Scripture. He should argue with God. Maybe Adam was to put both
hands on his hips, according to Ganism. He forgot, or is too dumb to understand
that Adam had “Speak the Word” power to fulfill his commission of tilling the
ground. Maybe he might steal this revelation and put it on his website, with a
little alteration.
He used a wonderful proverb that he can apply to himself: “Every
prudent man dealeth with knowledge; but a fool layeth open his folly.”(Proverb
13:16). This fits Gan so well, as we
can see from the above exposition and those that will follow. He said, “Dalton
Bruce is a real Branhamite.” It’s better that being a Ganite, and being
indoctrinated by Ganism, for money. Preachers have him fooled, and pretend to
believe him, for money, and he don’t have the discernment of it. His agents
tried to use our publication for money, while they claim to believe him. We
caught and exposed many of them, until they are now burning our Books.
Heretical Article No. 373:
Richard
Gan: “We don’t even need the
Branhamites to help us build for they
are also our adversaries.” (The Foundation and the Wall page 16).
E.O.D.H. Answer: Take note of his
sarcastic, bitter and hateful expression about message believers. This man
sounds more like a Jesuit, than a brother mixed up in his head.
Heretical Article No. 374:
Richard
Gan: “Adam was not created to be a tiller of the ground. A son of God is not
created to toil; he is a child of God. The Serpent-kind was created to be
subjected to him to do the tilling.” (The Original Sin page 47).
E.O.D.H.
Answer: God intended that Adam be a tiller of the ground, for the scripture said that, “There was
not a ‘man’ (not serpent) to till the ground”(Genesis 2:5).
Heretical Article No. 375:
Richard
Gan: “Mendel’s Law states that “every individual is the sum total of the
characteristics in its two immediate progenitors”…Cain, the son of the Serpent,
inherited a part of Eve’s nature, the nature of the Spirit of God which was in
Adam.” (The Original Sin page 27).
E.O.D.H.
Answer: The Bible said in
1John
Heretical Article No. 376:
Richard
Gan: “The two trees are two laws which
govern the sexual reproductive organ which
is found in the middle part of the human body (the garden).” (The Original
Sin page 61).
E.O.D.H. Answer: God made every natural
tree in
the ground. These two trees, however, were spiritual. The tree of
life was Christ, and the tree of death was the devil.
Quote:
W.M.B: “There were TWO
trees in the midst of the garden. The Tree of Life was Jesus. The other tree is definitely Satan.” (Church Ages page 102).
Heretical Article No. 377:
Richard
Gan: “It was the intention of God that
they would bring forth “seeds after
their kind” by physical union. Sexual
union was intended that the two shall be one flesh (Genesis
E.O.D.H.
Answer: If sex was the
right way, then why did Christ come by the virgin birth? Brother Branham said:
“Just like in the beginning, it was not
God's perfect will for children to be
born on the earth through sex. No
sir. God created man out of the dust of the earth. That was God's first and original will. But when sin came in, then
He permitted man to marry a wife legally and have children by her…But, you see, it never was His perfect will.
(Does God Change His Mind
Heretical Article No. 378:
Richard
Gan: “Brother Branham is not a prophet, he was only addressed as one. Quote:
“Bro. William Branham was not a prophet
in the 5-fold ministry…He was a messenger but he was addressed as a “prophet”
because the word “prophet” was commonly associated with an outstanding and
gifted servant of the Almighty God like the Old Testament prophets.” (Speak The
Word page 27).
E.O.D.H. Answer: Malachi 4:5&6 said: “Behold I will send you Elijah
the prophet.” Brother Branham said:
“The seventh angel has to be a prophet for the Word of God to come
to.” (The Breach 1963).
Heretical Article No. 382:
Richard
Gan: “After the fall, Polygamy was introduced by Lamech (a serpent seed) and
not by God or His children, but God
allowed it.”
E.O.D.H.
Answer: We challenge Gan
to produce one scripture or one quotation for this heresy. If he cannot, then
he is a presumptious heretic.
Heretical Article No. 383:
Richard Gan: “A
covenant of polygamy was not introduced after the fall. The covenant that was
made was that the man would rule the woman (Genesis 3:16).”
E.O.D.H. Answer: We are again asking Mr. Gan for a
Scripture to prove when the covenant of polygamy was introduced, if not after
the fall.
Quote
W.M.B.: Now you see then,
“after” the beginning, it was something else was introduced…Then when the
double covenant was made by man and woman through sex another covenant
altogether; not the original covenant ( but another covenant), now what’s introduced? Polygamy in all.
Then after the beginning, Polygamy was introduced both in man and beast after
the beginning, the fall… Second covenant: one male, many females: one buck
deer, a whole harem of does (is that right?); one bull a whole herd of cattle,
cows; one rooster, a yard full of hens (is that right?); one David, after God’s
own heart, with five hundred wives.” (Marriage and Divorce” – page 30)
Heretical Article No. 384:
Richard
Gan: “The prophets of the Old Testament each had one wife.”
E.O.D.H.
Answer: There is no
scripture or quotation to verify this assumption. Jacob had several wives.
David was a prophet, and he had five hundred wives.
“Men and brethren, let me freely speak
unto you of the patriarch David, that he is both dead and buried, and his
sepulchre is with us unto this day. Therefore being a prophet). (Acts 2:
29-30).
This proves my point that Gan cannot count
and needs to go back to the kindergarten school. God told the prophet Ezekiel
to marry two wives and he was a prophet.
Heretical Article No. 385:
Richard
Gan: “A woman could remarry if her husband divorces her for sexual
uncleanness (Deuteronomy 24:1-2), but if she was illegally put away and
remarries, she would be guilty of adultery.”
E.O.D.H.
Answer: This is a
horrible lie of the devil, with total disregard for the scripture: (Romans 7, I
Corinthians 7). He is mixing up the Old Testament Law with the New Testament.
Heretical Article No. 386:
Richard
Gan: “In Christ Jesus, there is no preference of the man over the woman,
therefore, not only the man could remarry.”
E.O.D.H.
Answer: Mr. Gan sounds
like a Jesuit or Pentecostal preacher from the Bible school, who is trying to
justify that a woman can preach. This is the same Scripture that they use. Next
on his agenda will be that a woman can preach; not only remarry. Any elect of
God, under this man’s ministry, should get out immediately, as it is leading to
the World Council of Churches.
Heretical Article No. 387:
Richard
Gan: “If a woman’s unbelieving husband departs, she can remarry according to
1 Corinthians 7:15.”
E.O.D.H.
Answer: I Corinthians
7:15 does not say that. It says that a brother or a sister is not under bondage
in such cases. It simply means that they are not compelled to abide with the
unsaved partner, if they want to depart. Paul commanded that the woman should
remain unmarried or be reconciled to her husband. That’s the commandment of the
Lord. How can this heretic change God’s word from the very same chapter.
I Corinthians 7:10-11 <And unto the
married I command, yet not I, but the Lord, Let not the wife depart from her
husband: But and if she depart, let her remain unmarried, or be reconciled to
her husband: and let not the husband put away his wife.>
Heretical Article No. 388:
Richard Gan:
“Mixed marriage is not a sin, nor is it
unscriptural; it can be practiced amongst believers.”
E.O.D.H.
Answer: Such a heresy is
totally contrary to the message. This doctrine was established in the message
by the prophet; who is Mr. Gan to change that truth. Again he has shown total
disregard for the teachings of the prophet.
Quote
W.M.B.: 1179-166 Now, I don't believe in mixing marriages. I
believe that a white man should not marry a colored girl, or a colored girl
marry a white man, or a yellow marry a colored,... I believe the brown, black,
white, and races of people are like a flower garden of God, and I do not believe they should be crossed up.
I believe that's the way God made them, and I believe that's the way they
should remain.
What... It fools me that I seen some real
pretty colored girl, intelligent, nice looking kid, just as pretty as any woman
you'd want to see... What does she want to marry a white man and have mulatto
children? What would an intelligent colored girl want with such a thing as
that?... I believe you should stay just
what we are. (Questions & Answers 64-0830E).
Heretical Article No. 389:
Richard Gan: “God
never ordained polygamy; Jesus did not sanction polygamy, neither did he condemn
it, but discouraged it. Paul never encouraged it.”
E.O.D.H.
Answer: Mr. Gan is
reading his Bible upside down. Jesus re-established the marriage institution in
Genesis, one man to one woman, Adam and Eve. Jesus took them back to the
beginning and specified, male and female singular and said, ‘it was not so from
the beginning,’ concerning polygamy. Paul never hinted that polygamy is alright
for Christians. Any man that advocates the doctrine of polygamy has a lustful
demon and could be very well living in adultery. I am still asking the
question, why Mr. Gan removed the veil from his daughter’s face, when it’s the
husband’s place to do it?
Matthew 19:4 <And he answered and said
unto them, Have ye not read, that he which made them at the beginning made them
male and female.>
Heretical Article No. 390:
Richard
Gan: “The serpent was a household servant to Adam. Adam was not created to
till the ground. The serpent was his servant, and he was to do the tilling.
Adam was to do his tilling through his servant
serpent because it was not God’s intention that a son of God should work
hard.”
E.O.D.H.
Answer: There is
absolutely no Scriptures nor quotations for such nonsense! This is based upon
Gan’s imagination. All that he can supply for this is science, reason and
intellectualism. He doesn’t know more than the Prophet William Branham, whom he
greatly despises and is perverting his message.
Heretical Article No. 391:
Richard
Gan: “The serpent and the seed of the serpent were tillers of the ground.
Adam’s lineage was mainly shepherds.”
E.O.D.H.
Answer: I challenge Gan
to bring one Scripture to prove this heresy. He won’t pick up that challenge
but will run to the god of science to shelter under the idea of pre-historic
man. Some people, especially preachers who seek money, bread and fish, cater to
him and pretend to believe his doctrine. They have him fooled. The same people
are in contact with us, trying to solicit money.
Heretical Article No. 392:
Richard
Gan: “Noah’s wife was either a Cainite or a hybrid, therefore Noah had to go
through the tribulation of the flood because he was unequally yoked in
marriage.”
E.O.D.H.
Answer: Again this is
built upon Gan’s imagination or his insanity. He needs another medical
examination immediately! Where is the Scripture for that? Your assumption is
mad.
Heretical Article No. 393:
Richard
Gan: “Seth and Japheth possessed serpentine traits which they inherited
genetically from their mother.”
E.O.D.H.
Answer: I would rather
believe that Gan fits this description more than the children of God in the Old
Testament, because they stayed with the Word of God but he twists and slides
around the Scriptures and the Message to justify his heresy.
Heretical Article No. 394:
Richard
Gan: “The Tree of Life and the tree of the knowledge of good and evil were
two laws that governed sexual relationship, either for pleasure or
reproduction.”
E.O.D.H.
Answer: Impossible! This
is contrary to the Bible and the Message of Malachi 4:5&6. Gan is an
outright, shameless, unbeliever and possibly a Jesuit, to destroy all
established doctrines of the Message through the Prophet. By this doctrine, he
is protecting his father and lineage. The two trees were two spirits. The tree
of life was Christ and the tree of the knowledge of good and evil was Satan.
From this evil tree Gan is drawing his inspiration. Beware of him! All true
children of God will denounce the heresies of this mad scientist.
Heretical Article No. 395:
Richard
Gan: “Genesis 4:26 means that men began to profanely call upon the Name of
the Lord.”
E.O.D.H.
Answer: Profanely calling
on the Lord fits Mr. Gan. He injected that word into the Bible. If this man has
no respect for the Bible, insomuch that he adds and takes away from it; would
he have respect for Brother Branham and the Message? Absolutely not! Such are
the traits of the serpent.
Heretical Article No. 396:
Richard
Gan: “All men today are traced back to Noah’s three sons for the inheritance
of their satanic traits.”
E.O.D.H.
Answer: Again Mr. Gan is
adding to the Word of God. He has no Scriptures, nor quotations to support this
heresy. There continued a righteous line from Genesis and an unrighteous. They
both came over the flood. What nonsense is Mr. Gan talking about? His mind is
corrupt concerning the serpent seed doctrine. Satan hates the serpent seed
doctrine, because it exposes him. Any man that is used to pervert that teaching
is covering up for Satan
Heretical Article No. 397:
Richard
Gan: “No literal and physical serpent seed exist today, for all died in the
flood.”
E.O.D.H.
Answer: He speaks like a
woman, who read the book of Enoch and wrote to me a few days ago. I will answer
Gan as I answered her. Who were Goliath and the sons of Anak? Before the flood
there were giants in the land and there were giants many years after the flood.
Jesus found them in clergy cloth and said, “Ye serpents,” also “Ye generations
of serpents,” traced them back to their father Cain, and Mr. Gan can be traced
back to the same progenitor, because he acts like Cain in his religion: self
opinionated and his perversion of the
message of our Abel today.