GANISM DENOUNCED

CHAPTER THIRTEEN

The following is a tract, sent out earlier, to warn Message Believers concerning the dangerous heretic Mr. Gan.

EXPOSITION OF DAMNABLE HERESIES:

GANISM DENOUNCED, BEWARE

Date: 22-04-04

“For such [are] false apostles, deceitful workers, transforming themselves into the apostles of Christ”. (II CORINTHIANS 11:1).

Beware of Ganism, Mr. Richard Gan the false apostle and deceitful worker who plans to visit several African states: Zimbabwe, Zambia, Malawi, Kenya and Uganda in the month of April 2004. Beware of his agents, as most of them seek after money and not truth. They have wearied this publication with their begging for money. They pretend to believe the Message and teachings of other ministers which are published. They have betrayed, sacrificed, and surrendered the souls of their flocks to the Isms, Heresies and devilish doctrines of Gan, who has perverted most of the established teachings of Brother Branham, Malachi 4:5-6 (W.M.B)

This man is so corrupt, that he has even changed the normal marriage practices. His daughter was wedded recently and he has a picture on his website where he is unveiling the bride instead of the husband. We need to ask this Heretic what is the meaning of unveiling his daughter? Is he sending a message to the world of another damnable heresy or indicating a corrupt practice? We appeal to all faithful Believers of the Message to boldly resist this heretic and his agents in your region and country.

He denies that Brother Branham was a prophet; proclaims that he is an apostle chosen to lay the foundation for the Church; seven men are to reveal the seven thunders; mixed marriages are not unscriptural; a divorce woman can be re-married and many other heresies which are contrary to the Word and message. However his aggressive attitude, with that of his agents are sufficient to help the humble in heart to grasp that his works are of Satan and inspired from the pit of Hell!

Many without careful examination of his doctrines accepted him as a brother and preacher of the Message but later denounced him and his heresies when they found out by his publication that he doesn’t believe W.M.B or his Message but seeks to destroy it. Is he hired by the Jesuits is the question of Message Believers. Others say that he is insane and are trying to verify if he is a mental patient in Singapore since rumors have it that way.

To convince, and snare innocent souls to his cult, he exports books; tapes etc and publish on his website, some old letters of commendation written to him about his work by some who had not known the depths of his satanic ministry. He refuses to pull down such letters, even after people denounced his cult, and commanded him to remove their letters. He is a shameless hypocrite, deceitful worker trying to use every form of guile to convince and enslave innocent souls.

Exposition of Damnable Heresies dealt him many blows by listing his heresies in comparison with W.M.B.’s doctrine on Books 2, and 8 etc. He is enraged like Lucifer and has entitled his own teachings quoted “Lies of Dalton Bruce” since he has no defense against the Word and refuses to admit that his heresies are of the Devil and the Bottomless Pit.

The following are letters, of some who have denounced him. You can do likewise if you are trapped by this heretic and his heresies! Is your letter advertised on his website without your knowledge and consent? Then you are identified with his heresies. Beware of Gan’s cunning devices.

LETTER TO GAN DATED 02-04-02:

CHUCKS – NIGERIA, AFRICA

Mr. Gan, I write to protest and to kick against my name that has been appearing on your website as one of the great supporters of your HERESIES. What is the madness with you? Please, for your own good, I don’t want to see my name on your website again. You better pull it down immediately, for your own good, or else I will declare it to the whole world that you are an ANTICHRIST and INSANE. I have studied and followed your teachings for some time, and have come to realize that you are an ANTICHRIST, working for your father the DEVIL, and your teachings and the doctrines you propagate is from the bottomless pit of HELL. Mr. Mad man, I would that you repent and pray for deliverance. Mr. Mad man, I vow to do everything possible to break your stronghold on innocent souls who are already caged and deadly drunk with your poisonous doctrines in this part of the world.   YOUR WORST ENEMY of your heresies---CHUKS.

Reply Letter To Bethel:

Beloved brethren, I write in defense of your question, regarding my relationship with Gan and the appearance of my name on his website as a great supporter of his devilish ministry.

To start with, I was very shocked and dismayed when Brother Gaitan informed me of such, which I never had knowledge of. Brethren, the truth is this, and I will also want you to investigate the matter in which ever way you desire; I never had any other dealing with Gan in time past, other than requesting for sermon books of the prophet (Brother Branham), but he ended up sending me his sermons, I not knowing that he was the devil's anointed false preacher in this end time to deceive many. Gan was able to deceive many of us then, because we saw him as an end time message believer. We never knew he was preaching heresies and was infusing death to us through his teachings, and being that we were seriously thirsty, hungry and destitute of the truth, we fell then so easily to his prey, out of ignorance and lack of knowledge of the message we believe. I express my joy and gladness over the great deliverance the Lord did wrought in my life and in the lives of some of our brethren in this part of the world through your wonderful bombshells (Exposition of Damnable Heresies), which really checked us and made us to know that most of the people we are holding in high esteem in the faith, including Gan, were only covering themselves with a cloak of Malachi 4, but inwardly, they are wolves in sheep clothing, working for their father, the devil.

Please, I categorically declare to you and to the entire world that I stand for nothing less than the Message that was restored back to us by the only Prophet of God to this generation (William Marrion Branham). I know no other Prophet, neither am I a follower or a supporter of the bottomless pit ministry of Mr. Gan. I strongly stand in support of what the Lord is doing through my precious brethren of like precious faith in Bethel, and I am ready to lay down my life in contending for the faith and in defense of the Book (Exposition of Damnable Heresies). Please help me with a very large quantity of the books. There are great demands for them. We can’t even boast of a copy on our library’s shelves. Thanks. Yours faithful Brother, Chucks Abrahams.

GANISM DENOUNCED IN the PHILIPPINES

Dear Brother Bruce, God bless you my brother. It is wonderful to read all the heretical teachings of this Brother from Singapore. I have also read some of his books that contradict the prophet's message. I disagree with them. As if his messages are all condemnable and destructive revelation. Yes, he claims to be one of the apostles but never respects the Prophet of this age. Brother Branham said that he preached what Paul preached. If he is a true apostle, then he should preach what the prophet preached.

I found some of his followers in the big city of Manila and also in the island of Mindanao. They are very arrogant. They look at us as if we are not message believers. They also concluded that the message today is of no use. It’s futile. They said that that was only seasonal and not food for all seasons. I was asking where we could find these seven men today. They could not produce even one. How could we believe on his messages when in fact they look like fiction, immaterial and groundless? Brother Branham said that if your revelation will not dovetail with the scripture, then forget it. But this man does not like to forget his false teaching.

This is one of the reasons why I wanted to open a Radio program again so that we can tell the poor saints to refrain from these people who are followers of this Brother. This is one sure way of proclaiming the truth to all the members of the Bride. Please continue to uphold this urgent request about the Broadcast, my Brother. Thank you for your endeavors. This is all, my Brother. God bless you and all the saints in your church. Yours in His service, L.V

This heretic Gan teaches that Brother Branham is not a prophet. Are his followers that blind that they cannot see and understand the simplicity of the scripture, which says:

“Behold, I will send you Elijah the prophet before the coming of the great and dreadful day of the LORD:

And he shall turn the heart of the fathers to the children, and the heart of the children to their fathers, lest I come and smite the earth with a curse”. {Malachi 4:5-6}

The major Prophet Malachi 4:5-6 has spoken by the word of God, whom do you believe Gan the heretic, deceiver and false apostle or God and His prophet? Choose the way of the Lord’s faithful pilgrims; be bold and defiant like those who have denounced Ganism to save their souls and their congregations. Repent or perish!

Seemingly, this self appointed apostle has been convicted after such apostolic and radical exposure on our previous publications. He reads our E.O.D.H. Books, and even stole some of the truths from pages 79 to 83 of E.O.D.H. Book 5, using the very quotations, with a few alterations on the headings, which he published on his website, under the title: “A word about the seven thunders – from the mouth of William Branham.”

If we are so wrong, then why is he stealing these revelations? On one hand he reads our Books and on the other, one of his agents (Togonon from Philippines) burnt one of our Books and sent us a photo of it.

Franco Togonon, Gan’s Agent

Franco Togonon: ‘To Mr. Satan’s agent: Dalton Bruce. Your poisonous book shall all be burned like this one. You shall go to hell ye, bastard!’

GANISM: BEWARE OF FRANCO TOGONON AND OTHER AGENTS OF THE PHILIPPINES

E.O.D.H: Reference to picture. This poor half naked man tried to hide his identity, but was identified as Franco Togonon, from Cavite, Philippines. He is well known by our associate ministers for his aggression against E.O.D.H. He is a faithful follower of the heretic Mr. Gan. He has written to this publication several times, begging for money, pretending to believe the truth that we proclaim. He is capable of soliciting funds from any and every church and publication around the world. He has fully manifested the spirit of Mr. Gan by burning our books. He is proud, arrogant and maybe violent when his request for money is denied. May I suggest to this poor deluded soul to desist from burning the Word of God, as all our books are fully supported by Scriptures and quotations of the Message. When he burns our writings, the Message and the Scriptures are also burnt. If he fails to repent, he will one day be burnt in the Lake of Fire. I forgive him for destroying our books and uttering such blasphemy against me. May he find mercy at the Cross of Christ. This gives an idea of how desperate a poor soul can be in defending an antichrist and false prophet like Richard Gan.

PASTOR JAMES: AGENT OF MR. GAN: SINGAPORE

CONTENTIONS & CHALLENGE AGAINST E.O.D.H.

Heretic Pastor James

Church of the Lord Jesus Christ,

Near Canara Bank, Coonoor, Nilgiris District, TAMILNADU- INDIA.

All contentions and strifes of religions must have a sound foundation or their battles are in vain. They fight against the wind. The Apostle Paul said, “We must strive lawfully”. Jude said, “Contend for the faith”. The faith was restored to the church by Malachi 4:5-6. It was once delivered to the saints by the Lord Jesus and the church was built upon the rock of revelation (Matthew 16). It is also built upon the foundation of the apostles and prophets (Ephesians 2:20).

All who oppose our work, which aims to keep the purity of the message by our publishing arm (E.O.D.H.) are not striving lawfully by the Word of God and the revelation of the message of the hour. Many contend for their own private interpretation of the Word, while others contend for the heresies of heretics. Automatically, their church members fall under that spirit of error and support a losing battle for heretics and heresies. This they ignorantly do, not perceiving the selfish motive of their “beloved” shepherd. In most cases, he is after a meal ticket as a hired agent of a heretic, after popularity or women. All may not fit the above description but are sincerely deceived, stirred-up by heretics to fight the truth. Those who are after a meal ticket deny the Word and willfully close their eyes to the prophet’s teachings. Since they are so dishonest and careless about the souls of the flock, they criticize E.O.D.H., because it exposes them, their heretic leaders and their heresies.

Here is a party who will manifest one of the above described categories. E.O.D.H will answer his contentions and fusses in a scriptural manner. If he is after eternal life, he would respond positively, with repentance and reconciliation to the purity of the message. If not, it will make the tree evil. Every sheep under his care should flee to safety in Christ. The answers to his contentions and rejection of our answers will prove that he is not contending for the faith but for Ganism, the heretic Gan, popularity and a meal ticket, which will automatically identify him as a heretic, creeping into houses “and lead captive silly women laden with sins, led away with divers lusts, Ever learning, and never able to come to the knowledge of the truth.” (II Timothy 3:6-7).

Although Pastor James has declared open war on the message of the Bible and E.O.D.H., we endeavor to speak to him in the interest of his soul and those under his care. This I have done in the same manner to his leader, Mr. Gan, before I openly declared him as a heretic. I trust that pastor James will repent. It will prove his love for his flock!

Pastor James: “Where was E.O.D.H. before the prophet passed away, about forty years ago? E.O.D.H. is now publishing the standards of holiness concerning: “A woman should not expose her belly from the Saree: Men should remove mustache: Women should not wear “Churidhar”: How can this be instituted to the followers of Malachi 4:5-6, since the prophet never spoke about those things so seriously?”

Question # 1: “Where was E.O.D.H. forty years ago?”

E.O.D.H. Answer: The ignorance expressed in asking the above question is embarrassing. Pastor James needs to study the Word and message to show himself approved of God. May I try to edify you, friend. Exposition of Damnable Heresies was right from Genesis and traveled until now. You can find E.O.D.H. in the Bible. E.O.D.H. was not introduced within the forty years since the prophet’s departure, but since four thousand years ago, it was published by great prophets of old: our Lord Jesus Christ, Peter, James, John, Paul and Jude. All published in a great way, from then, even until the time of our prophet, Brother Branham. All of those prophets, including the prophet of our age, Brother Branham, called the names of heretics, published them throughout the world, and most of them are recorded in Bible. So there is no surprise that E.O.D.H. is also continuing in our days by God-called men.

All servants of God were commissioned of God to expose wrong and preach the truth, including exposition of heretics (Matthew 23, II Peter 2, Jude 1 & II Timothy).

Question # 2: “Should a woman expose her belly?”

E.O.D.H. Answer:

IMMORAL DRESS WITH YOUR BODY SHOWING THROUGH IT

Quote W.M.B.: 314 “Sister…would you wear these little old skirts and things that they wear today of this immoral dress, with your body showing through it out there on the street? Did you know every man that looks upon you commits adultery with you in his heart? And you present yourself like that. Do you know, women, you that wear makeup, there's only one woman in the Bible that ever wore makeup? And God fed her to the dogs. (Modern events made clear by prophecy 65-1206).

Brother Branham fully declared that a woman should not wear any garment where her underneath clothes is imprinted or is showing. E.O.D.H. has declared the same: Book 6 page 43. This is not a new doctrine by a new book. It is the Word:

I Timothy 2:9 <In like manner also, that women adorn themselves in modest apparel…>

The eyes of lustful preachers fail to understand what modesty looks like. Their souls are corrupt. The prophet’s soul was pure, thus he established holiness standards for women. Pastor James, your conscience alone should let you know that a woman exposing her belly is sinful, sex-suggestive and immodest. Shame on you pastor!

Question # 3: “Should women wear Churidhar?”

E.O.D.H. Answer:

Quote W.M.B.: They know what God said about it here. See? Sure. God said so, so they want to do it anyhow. See, they try to find an excuse. "Well, I think it's much better; it's--it's not... The wind don't blow..." But God said for a man to dress different from a woman. If a woman put on a garment pertained to a man, it was abomination in His sight. So it's not right. Yes. You shouldn't do it, no.

See? So therefore, it's wrong. But you see, they try to find an excuse that "the Lord told me to do this." I don't say He didn't, but look, it ain't His perfect will. It's got to be His permissive will. You see what it'll do? It'll pollute the whole bunch. It polluted all the camp. (Does God Ever Change His Mind 65-0418E).

Your statement is very popular in India, to make many excuses against the holiness message of Brother Branham. Be it known to you, if you had not known it earlier, that our national garment for women is Saree with full stretched top or blouse (Which fully covers the women’s bellies). Our older women were wearing the Saree’s with long sleeves and tops which covers the belly. Belly exposure was introduced by Bollywood stars, so any woman under the message of Malachi 4:5-6, wearing Saree with belly exposure, is following the styles of Bollywood actors and she is unfit to call herself a believer of the message.

Quote W.M.B.: And then all the holiness in the Bible that's been preached and what you've been taught, you still, you women strip yourselves and go half naked. You men do just as contrary. You set around, let your wife act like that, and dress like that, and say nothing about it. Well, you puppet. How would you ever make a preacher? How would you make a deacon? If you can't control your own house, what are you going to do in the house of God? That's the reason the house of God's in the shape it's in today. We need men with brass knucks to preach the Gospel, to uncover sin and show where it's at, not some little petty thing. We need an old fashion breaking up, tearing down, molding over. We need a old time Saint Paul's revival and the Bible Holy Ghost back into the church again, instead of a bunch of little isms. (Door To The Heart 1958).

Quote: How could people... You mean to tell me, you women can walk out here at them little bitty straps around you and call yourself living in a modern civilized world? When heathens is dressed that way and get right with Christ, try to cover themselves up till they get some clothes on them. Looks like you're going back to heathens instead of coming to civilization. Now, you know that's the truth. And just another little thing. I don't see it in this building, but lot of you women that wears this here paint, and you know, and black stuff over your eyes and everything. You know where that come from? That trait is heathen. That's exactly where it come from. They've had them great big bones in their ears for earrings, and take mud and paint their faces and all over like that. It's a heathen trait. Then we permit it in our churches. "Sure, it's all right."

"Oh, it ain't what you do this way; it ain't what you do that way." No, I know it ain't. But you get right with Christ one time, and you'll wash your face. That's exactly right. You'll put on clothes and act like a lady. And you'll throw that cigar out of your mouth if you are a deacon or something in the church, and act like a Christian too. That's exactly right. (Stand Still 1957).

Quote: I heard a woman the other day laughing at a girl--a bunch of half naked females with morals lower than a--than a mother dog, laughing at an old woman with a long dress. Listen here, you little twisted-up female; she's got something you know nothing about; she's got moral. You don't even know what the name is. You lost it in the cradle almost. You don't even know right from wrong; she does. She's got something hid in her heart that you don't know nothing about. You lost it; can never find it. Don't you call her old fashion, and so forth, like that. She knows something that you don't know nothing about. She's got hid in her heart, treasure of decency. You don't know one word of it. Your mammy brought you up like that. Your pastor permitted it; shows where he stands. I'm preaching about him right here now. See? See where you're at? The churches. (Recognizing Your Day 1964).

Question # 4: “Should men remove their moustache?”

E.O.D.H.: 1Timothy 4:12 <Let no man despise thy youth; but be thou an example of the believers, in word, in conversation, in charity, in spirit, in faith, in purity.>

“Be thou an example.” This is a question of concern to many brothers. The beard was used as a badge of the dignity of manhood. It was regarded as an object of oath. It was shaven or plucked out in mourning. It was neglected in permanent affliction. It was an object of salutation. Dressing, trimming and anointing of the beard was done with much ceremony by people of wealth. Removal of the beard was part of the ceremonial treatment of a leper. Of recent times, beards are kept by highly educated people as a sign of their education, profession. It portrays a person’s motives and objectives standing in society, communism and religious cults.

In 1Timothy 4:12, Paul exhorted Timothy to be an example to the believers. Our prophet messenger, Brother William Branham was our example. He kept a clean face.

Quote W.M.B.: “Now, that doesn't mean that we have to grow a long beard, as the artist pictures Him having. And neither does it mean that we grow long hair as the artist pictures Him having, or to wear robe as He wore; for we're living in another day. We don't necessarily have to be that to reflect His physical image; but we must, in our souls, reflect His Spirit image and His manner of life.” (Images of Christ 59-0525  P:18).

Quote: 15-3 “The people don't want to act any different than what the rest of the world acts. They don't want to get on the street and to have their face washed, and men with clean countenance.” (Rejected King 60-0515M).

Quote: E-10 “I want to pass a compliment on a man that's in the building. He's conspicuous in one way… Brother Ryan, I'm speaking of you… he wears a long beard, and a long hair, or hair to his shoulder.” (For Him Will I Accept 52-0718).

The Prophet said to keep a clean countenance. We try to obey the prophet as close as possible. He was our example. He left no hair on his face, except he was in the woods and could not shave. However, we are not fanatical on the subject. There are youths that appreciate their hairs growing out, making them feel manly; so we don’t press them, until it starts getting plentiful; but generally, men keep a clean countenance under this ministry, as Brother Branham got down on many brothers who wore hair on their faces.

Quote W.M.B.: E-7 “And you know, there was an old man used to follow meeting. Many of you might've seen him, a few of you maybe. He had a long beard. His name was Ryan, John Ryan... I used to get on him about wearing his beard.” (Blind Bartimaeus 57-0127e).

E.O.D.H. book 13: page 246 declared what the prophet established. We have no message of our own. Mr. Gan was not ordained to correct the message of Elijah the prophet. Denounce that heretic, Pastor James. Don’t let down the gospel on the pulpit; allowing women’s bellies to be exposed, men with hair on their faces like Muslims, communists etc, women to wear pants in public, and most unscripturally, to allow a man to minister, whose wife is not in the faith. Save your soul friend, and those who you will account to God for.

PEOPLE WILL GO TO HELL BECAUSE PASTOR LET DOWN THE GOSPEL

Quote W.M.B.: E-31 “That's what's the matter, pastor. What's the matter, our people will go to hell is because you let down the Gospel in the pulpit; that's exactly what it is. If you preach the Gospel, the power of God unto salvation, have an old fashion altar call and have people cleaned up in their life, it would be different. It would be examples set forth in Christianity. That's right. But we've let down the bar somewhere.” (Expectation 55-1001).

Question # 5: “Can’t a minister continue to minister under the message of W.M.B., even if his wife is NOT IN THE FAITH? Brother Branham allowed this thing in his ministry. I can prove it by quotations of W.M.B.”

E.O.D.H. Answer: E.O.D.H. humbly challenges you to show one quotation where Brother Branham allowed a minister to continue ministering, whose wife is not in the faith?

1 Timothy 3 and Titus 1 gave a clear description of the qualification of a minister, that his wife should be in the faith, his children should be in the faith and he should rule his house well. This is also for the deacons and the elders qualifications.

Whoever ordained a disqualified man, whoever put him on the pulpit and started him off in a church, they need to be corrected. We ought to follow the guidelines of the scripture concerning the qualifications of a minister before we ask him to use the pulpit or ordain him. There are certain preachers who never started in a church. They came out of jail, were smoking marijuana, cut off their Rasta hair and took up a Bible and started evangelizing. Such a man is not fit for the pulpit, and whether he should step down or not, there isn’t any question about it. He doesn’t belong on the pulpit.

Ganism has twisted every major doctrine that was established by the prophet. Pastor James should examine his doctrine by the Word and message.

According to 1 Timothy, a preacher’s wife must be in the faith and his children must be in the faith. If he is a compromiser with his children, he is not fit to stand behind the pulpit. If his wife is unsaved and refuses to come to church, he cannot be a preacher unless he separates. If he separates for the gospel’s sake then that is in a different category. He is lined up with the apostles.

Question # 6: “Can’t sisters read the Bible in the churches under the message of W.M.B.? E.O.D.H. is bringing out its own doctrine regarding sisters. On one occasion, Brother Branham asked a sister to read the Bible in church.”

E.O.D.H. Answer: A woman should keep silent in the church according to the Bible, and it is not E.O.D.H.’s own doctrine. (1 Corinthians 14:34 & 1 Timothy 2:12). E.O.D.H. is upholding this doctrine.

The answer is: No! because it breaks the scripture over here. How could she be silent and be reading the Bible at the same time? She could not do that as a policy or an establishment in the house of God.

Now, in certain meetings, Brother Branham while preaching, he was searching for certain scriptures and there was a sister standing there, and he went on to tell her on a rare occasion to read, and she read, but that was not establishing a policy in the House of God or amongst message believers. That does not mean that preachers could call “sister spiritual” to read the Bible and she could come to the pulpit and read the Word. That is in a different category all entirely. Under certain conditions the Prophet of God, William Branham, Elijah the prophet, allowed a certain sister to read. It is not our custom. And even though a man of God does that on a rare occasion, then that is his responsibility towards God. But to establish that as a doctrine and take what Brother Branham done in a certain place is out. There are several things that Brother Branham done under his ministry that you and I cannot practice. We don’t follow what the man done, in such context, we follow what he taught, and his words are that we should not tolerate these things in the House of God. You cannot use what Brother Branham done. He knew how he done them and why he done them, and you cannot do them and establish them as policies in the House of God, because you are breaking what Brother Paul said: “Let the women keep silent in the church; it is not permitted for her to speak; if she would know anything let her ask her husband at home.” Should she read the Bible for the preacher? No! The answer is no. I would not advise my brethren to practice that. I’m just talking about the right attitude, and as a result of that we don’t practice such things in the house of God.

Question # 7: “All the message churches in India are reading SPOKEN WORD PUBLICATIONS. But many of the followers of Malachi 4:5-6 are disturbed by E.O.D.H. because many DO’S and DON’T’S are there in those books. A distributor of the book, Ronald Watson of Karanataka, India, is traveling with these books and disturbing to the people under this message. What right has he got to do this kind of job? Let him do this kind of work in his church.”

E.O.D.H. Answer: All message believers should read the books. However, many are not available to those in India, Africa and other countries. Ministers hide certain truths from the people and ministers. E.O.D.H. tells all that the prophet said on a subject, and relates it to the Word. It exposes heresies.

Many are afraid of E.O.D.H. because they want to entertain sin in the church. Certain sins have already crept inside and are working in many churches. Therefore, when they invite E.O.D.H. ministers in their churches to preach from their pulpits, and many DO’S and DON’TS from the message are stressed upon, they do not like it, because the black dog inside of them wants to be fed more than the white dog. Not many in India are disturbed by E.O.D.H., but only a few, because they are much troubled that E.O.D.H. will expose their heresies and war against the message of Malachi 4:5-6. They are much concerned about the distributor of the EODH in India, because their exposition will go all around India and to the rest of the world. Try not to be like them, Pastor James. It is not our desire to expose anyone.

E.O.D.H. has no boundaries. E.O.D.H. distributors will go anywhere and to any church wherever God wants them, by invitation of pastors. Their duty is to obey the Shepherd and bring deliverance to souls from the heretics. Deliverance is taking place all over in the world. Many were set free from Ganism. You and your people can also be delivered.

We establish the DO’S and DON’TS of the Bible, and also those which the prophet emphasized. If you love the Lord, you will keep His commandments. Mr. Gan has destroyed the ABCs of the Word and message. Come out of that delusion, Pastor James, or you will be sorry.

Question # 8: “We do not need to read E.O.D.H. publications. The Bride can go in the Rapture just reading SPOKEN WORD books, and we don’t need anybody like distributor Ronald Watson to teach us from E.O.D.H. books. Is this book authorized and sanctioned by Brother Branham, as he sanctioned the writings of CHURCH AGES BOOK?”

E.O.D.H. Answer: “Pastor James, a man must strive lawfully or he will defeat his own argument. Be honest. Did Brother Branahm authorize and sanction Mr. Gan’s books? According to your question, you are condemning Ganism when you condemn E.O.D.H. In essence, you are saying that no books should be published since Brother Branham went home.

Pastor James, holy men spake and wrote as they were moved by the Holy Ghost. E.O.D.H. is based on the Word and the inspired words of the prophet. It is not in contradiction of the message and Word, like Ganism. His books should be taken off the market. Our ministers stay in the Word and inspiration of Malachi 4: 5-6, and should be in circulation.

E.O.D.H. has not made claims of having twelve foundation stones, like Ganism, seven men for the seven thunders, and Gan as an apostle. No one has to read our books to go in the rapture, but must get the revelation of the message of Brother Branham. We highlight the final outpouring of the Holy Ghost for rapture power. The prophet said, “You must have the token or perish.”

Reading the Spoken Word Books cannot take a man in the rapture. You must have the capstone or token, or perish. Many who read the Spoken Word Books, like those who read the Bible, will go through the tribulation. “The letter killeth but the Spirit giveth life.” Are you reading Gan’s books? It will keep all earthbound.

Everybody doesn’t have a pastor who can prepare them for the rapture. All pastors are not God-sent pastors. As a result, not all pastors will lead their congregations to the rapture. Some will lead them to the tribulation, while others will lead them to the rapture. Some pastors are hirelings while others are true shepherds of the flock.

The qualification of a pastor to lead his flock to the rapture is that he must have the revelation to get a person born again. If your pastor can preach the true Word that will get you born again, then you need not worry; but if he cannot, then you need to find and sit under a true pastor who can do so.

Question # 9: “What right does E.O.D.H. editors have to publish the names of Gan’s agents and other ministers all around the world? It is against the will of the Lord. So these E.O.D.H. books are full of condemnations.”

E.O.D.H. Answer: If you are saying that E.O.D.H. editors have no right to publish the names of heretic Gan’s agents and other heretics in the world, then Paul, James, John, Jude, Peter were all wrong. They called the names of the heretics and published them in their days. Even Brother Branham called many heretics names publicly and it was published in the Spoken Word books. Then they all went against the will of the Lord.

E.O.D.H. is saying that they all were in the will of the Lord and they all condemned the heretics with their heresies. If E.O.D.H. is full of condemnation, the Bible is also full of condemnation. The Bible, Spoken Word, and E.O.D.H. looks like they are condemning, but they divide wrong from right and truth from error. Prove yourself a son of God by standing for truth, Pastor James, because from the beginning, the Bible condemned the deeds of Satan and his servants.

Question # 10: “The prophet, Brother Branham had seen the preview of the Bride in a vision. He had seen them in their national garments. So LUNGI & CHURIDHAR are South Indian dress, and according to the prophet, they are allowed to be worn. The ministers meetings, India questions and answers, Trinidad 2006, report does not permit men to wear LUNGI, when the prophet justified it. Few ministers of the E.O.D.H. are against the message of Prophet WMB.”

E.O.D.H. Answer: LUNGI is not the NATIONAL garment, for men IN India. Their national garment, as Brother Branham saw the vision of three hundred thousand people receiving Christ in one of the Branham’s meeting in Calcutta. He seen them in DHOTI. Lungi is exactly like long skirts: women’s garment, and those who wear it are breaking Deuteronomy 22:5. Our old men, according to the history of India, wore DHOTI, but not LUNGI. Lungi was introduced by the Buddhist religion, which traveled through the Northern part of India and traveled down to the Southern part of India, and men replaced the DHOTI with the LUNGI.

An unbeliever in the message of Malachi 4, Bishop Reckart, had to make fun of Gan for wearing a Lungi, asking Gan if he was normal, stating that Gan was wearing a skirt and that he supported cross-dressing of men and women, and branding him as a sissy, a closet transvestite or possible homosexual. He even showed in the Bible that the wearing of breaches was for men only.

Leviticus 6:10 <And the priest shall put on his linen garment, and his linen breeches shall he put upon his flesh, and take up the ashes which the fire hath consumed with the burnt offering on the altar, and he shall put them beside the altar.> Also Leviticus 16:4, Exodus 28:42, 39:28 and Ezekiel 44:18.

Gan became a stumblingblock to many people, even in the message.

The Bible said, I Corinthians 8:13 <Wherefore, if meat make my brother to offend, I will eat no flesh while the world standeth, lest I make my brother to offend.>

GANISM DENOUNCED IN ZAMBIA

I am Brother Joseph Nyangu, a preacher of righteousness and at present receiving instructions on how to expose damnable heresies. I am contented to proclaim to everyone that I stand here in Zambia free from Ganism. I would like to alert my precious brothers and sisters to check this man’s publications seriously with the bible and the message before they can put across any disapproval from these writings.

Gan’s philosophy cannot just go by like that without any remark being passed by the one who was once entangled in his heresies. He has perverted the message and tarnished the image of the prophet William Marrion Branham. I wrote to him to denounce his heresies after making a comprehensive check throughout his teaching.

Allow me at this moment to give tribute to Exposition Of Damnable Heresies (E.O.D.H.) for stopping and silencing the mouth of this self-proclaimed prophet/apostle. May God continue to bless E.O.D.H that more souls may be delivered from the shackles of Ganism.

Richard Gan is a Singaporean Born Chinese International Heretic who claims to believe the prophet and the message and has a book publication ministry where he stated in his writing that: -

Ø Prophetic Revelation was adopted and afterwards confirmed after seeing an article in the local newspaper.

Ø He is a prophet and an apostle doing the work of restoring the apostolic foundation

Ø The message of Brother Branham can never perfect the Bride.

Let’s begin from here:

Prophetic Revelation:

Quote Richard Gan: …So, in March 1974, ‘Prophetic Revelation’ was adopted as the new name of our present ministry. A sign was given to me, several days later, as a confirmation of the right choice of the new name when an article entitled “What is prophetic revelation?” appeared in the local newspaper. (Foundation and the wall page 47)

Richard Gan adopted prophetic revelation as a new name for his ministry in March 1974. After seeing an article in the local newspaper entitled, “What is prophetic revelation?”, he claims that was a sign given to him confirming the name for the present ministry. He is afraid to bring out what kind of sign was given to him, nevertheless we ask him to further explain about the sign so that we can check it by the bible and the message because we are not interested in man made-up stories. Gan is telling us that God confirmed to him about his Prophetic Revelation through the media, a local newspaper instead of the bible. He saw an attractive headline in the local newspaper and that was a confirmation to him from God.

Brethren, the bible says, prove all things; hold fast to that which is good. Richard Gan did not endorse his claim by any scripture and the message of the hour. So how are we going to believe such a one? There isn’t any scripture or quotation from the prophet to back his claim?

Apostle Paul did not receive any revelation of the word of God from the media or any of the newspapers. He preached his message by the revelation of Jesus Christ. Brother Branham said they copy and compare with the world; we cannot be a success by doing anything the world does.

Quote WMB: But man wanted to be like, they compare, or to copy after, go like the world does, say the things that they do, make a success the way they were a success. We cannot never be a success doing anything the world does. We can only be a success as we follow after God’s statutes and His ways of doing thing. We can never be by patterning after the world. If the cigarette company has met their greatest success by television, and the beer and the whiskey crowd has made their great success through the contribution of television, That’s no sign that the church shall make its success by television. The success of the church lies within the preaching of the Gospel, of the power of God, and the demonstration of the spirit. (A Deceived Church by the World L -13).

The church cannot be a success by copying worldly knowledge (local newspaper and television). The success of the church lies within the preaching of the Gospel. The success of the church lies in the power of God and demonstration of the spirit. The church cannot copy from the media because the media is a technique of the enemy. The techniques of the church lie in the revelation of the Holy Ghost to his prophets. You will never please God with worldly ambitions and knowledge, because they are enmity to God.

Quote WMB: And there’s no need for any man to try to take his worldly knowledge and ever please God with it. It’s an abomination in the sight of God. You will never please God with the worldly ambitions and knowledge, because it’s enmity to God, says the Scripture. He cannot do it. (Deceived Church by the World L 16).

The prophet said it is an abomination in the sight of God for anyone to try to take worldly knowledge and please God with it. God cannot use the local newspaper to give a message to his children. God has got his way of doing things and that is through the scriptures. The scripture in the book of Matthew 5:14 says, “Ye are the light of the world. A city that is set on an hill cannot be hid.” The world must copy from the church and not vice versa. The world can never be the light of the church.

Apostle Paul in the book of Galatians 1:11 said,

“But I certify you, brethren, that the gospel which was preached of me is not after man. For I neither received it of man, neither was I taught it, but by the revelation of Jesus Christ.”

Richard Gan’s Prophetic ministry did not originate from God. He received his confirmation from man; he was taught by man from the local newspaper. And all these medias of local newspapers are techniques of the devil. Satan controls these medias. Therefore Richard Gan’s prophetic revelation is from the devil, direct from the abyss.

Brethren, prophetic revelation is the mechanism of Satan, which the devil is using to kill the message. I call all followers of Richard Gan to understand the simplicity of the scripture and the message and separate from this heretic and his heresies. We have identified his ministry; it is a machinery of the devil. We therefore refute, defy and expose it.

“God has reaffirmed my prophetic teaching ministry”:

Quote Richard Gan: “God has reaffirmed my prophetic teaching ministry, and has called me, as an apostle, to the work of 'restoring' the apostolic foundation. I knew I would have to travel when the time came for me to do so. I was still working as a male nurse at that time. So, I just recorded the dream and the interpretations in my Bible and awaited the fulfillments”. (Foundation and the wall. page 50).

Richard Gan claims that God reaffirmed his prophet-teaching ministry. This man in short calls himself a prophet. He claims that God confirmed his prophet-teaching ministry to him, only that he is afraid to openly declare that office. The word affirmed means confirmed or acknowledged. Reaffirmed means confirmed twice. Gan is telling the world that God twice confirmed his prophetic office. Let us check his claim with the bible and the message.

Now to start with brethren there is no scriptural evidence to support such a claim. No one from among the apostles of Jesus was ever called by a dream. The scripture rejects this man and his claim; he never saw Jesus Christ face to face. A prophet does not go to sleep in order to be called. Joseph the husband of Mary could not say God reaffirmed my prophetic teaching ministry after seeing an angel in a dream because he was not a prophet. Richard Gan claims that God told him that he is a teacher of prophecy but regrettably, where in the New Testament and the message was a prophet called by a dream?

Quote W.M.B.: 50. Now, dreams are not an assurance. Every dream is not from God. Now, there’s many people that has dreams, and they have all kinds of dreams. And you go to bed at night, and eat a big supper and go to bed, and you might dream anything. You might have a fever, and you might have all kinds of nightmares, and so forth, that isn’t God. (We have seen his Star and have come to worship him, Page 9).

Mr. Gan cannot teach anyone how to prophesy. He is miles away from it. And nowhere in the New Testament and the Message, God ever appeared in a dream and said, I call, affirm and reaffirm your prophetic, apostolic and teaching ministry. Brother Branham said a dream is a secondary way of God speaking to a just man that is if there is no prophet in the land.

Quote WMB: 88 Joseph, her husband, being a just man he pondered on the things… studied in the Scriptures. How could these things be?” While he was studying, the Angel of the Lord appeared to him in a dream. He wasn’t a prophet. And there wasn’t a prophet on the earth in those days, no one who could come to him with THUS SAITH THE LORD, so the Lord took the secondarily way. That’s a dream; …there was no prophet in the land, so He took secondarily, the dream. A PROPHET, OR SEER, DOESN’T GO TO SLEEP, HE SEES THE ANGEL STANDING HERE. The other man just goes to sleep, and he sees the Angel. (We have Seen His Star And Have Come To Worship Him December 16, 1963).

Peter did not go to sleep to receive his calling as an apostle, Paul did not go to sleep to receive his calling as an apostle. He heard Jesus speaking, “Saul, Saul, why persecutest thou me?” And he said, “Who are art thou, Lord?” Acts 9: 4-5. If Gan alleges to be a prophet in the five-fold ministry I have news for him. No prophet was ever called by a dream among the apostles. The apostles were called by a fire burning experience and by the Lord personally calling them. The bible says in Romans 3:4; let every man be a liar and God be true always.

We challenge all the followers of Richard Gan to believe the scriptures and the prophet rather than a hypocrite who claims to believe the prophet and at the same time contradicts him. The scripture states, “…Believe in the Lord your God so shall ye be established; believe his prophets, so shall ye prosper. (II Chronicles 20:20). “Surely the Lord God will do nothing, but he revealeth his secret unto his servants the prophets.” (Amos 3:7). Richard Gan substituted God’s program with his program. But unbelief will not hinder God’s program. Unbelief will kill the unbeliever.

A dream is a secondary way of God speaking when there isn’t a prophet in the land. Any dream and any interpretation must be examined by the scriptures. He dreamed and recorded the interpretation in the bible. But that is far away from being a prophet.

Quote W.M.B.: A prophet, or seer, doesn’t go to sleep, he sees the angel standing here.

Brethren, there is a lot of canal impersonations with Richard Gan. He cannot continue with the scriptures and the message because he is not a genuine sent of God. But a true prophet sent by God will live on the word and will by no means contradict the other prophets. This man inverts dreams. He never saw Jesus face to face. His claim is groundless and unfounded from any of the prophet’s messages and God’s infallible word of truth. We have therefore proven false Gan’s claim of God reaffirming his prophetic teaching ministry. His claim is satanic to mislead the children of God.

“God Has Called Me As An Apostle”:

Quote Richard Gan: “God has reaffirmed my prophetic teaching

ministry, and has called me, as an apostle, to the work of 'restoring' the apostolic foundation …” (Foundation and the wall. page 50).

He claims that he was called as an apostle to the work of restoring the apostolic foundation. Gan claim that he is an apostle and God confirmed that twice to him in a dream. Let us hear him again

Now brethren, it was a man from USA who handpicked Richard Gan and made him pompous.

Quote Richard Gan: In November 1980, a minister from California, U.S.A. …Visited Singapore. When he visited Singapore, he ministered to our little church for three nights. On the third night, as he ministered, he began to discern the people in the church. Then he turned around, to where I was sitting at the side, and pointed at me and said, “Brother Gan, you have an apostolic ministry. The time is come for you to move.”(The Foundation and the wall page 50).

Let us prove if this handpicked apostle is from the bible. He claims to be restoring the apostolic foundation. Which scripture is he fulfilling so that we might believe him? The prophet fulfilled Matthew 17:11:

“And Jesus answered and said unto them, “Elias truly shall first come, and restore all things.”

The prophet is restored and Gan claims he is also restoring. How many restorers do we have in Matthew 17:11? Apostle Paul, according to 1 Corinthians 3:10 said,

“According to the grace of God which is given unto me, as a wise master builder, I have laid the foundation, and another buildeth thereon. Let every man take heed how he buildeth thereon.”

Paul laid the foundation of the Gentile church being the first star to the Gentiles. Brother Branham later restored the church to the already laid foundation according the words of Jesus Christ in Mathew 17:11, and the Elijah we know is none other than Malachi 4:5-6. This means that Gan’s foundation is built on the sand because there is no other foundation any man can lay apart from the one which was laid by Apostle Paul and restored by the Prophet William Branham. The word of God was never lost. The church was lost. The prophet with his message takes us back to the word. The prophet and his message restore the church to the word.

Which foundation is Richard Gan talking about? He wants to create himself an office. No Sir, the five fold must perfect and edify the church. We have been built upon the foundation of the apostles and the prophets. This took Malachi 4:5-6, not to point like Gan suggests, but to turn our hearts, to restore, re-establish, and bring us back to the foundation of the apostles and the prophets. Elijah and his message takes us back even to a place where we shall receive creative power. There is no position for Richard Gan. If Gan is restoring a foundation that is a foundation for his church. As we heard that some men ran away from his church.

Now dreams are not all accurate they can be inverted. No apostle was ever called by a dream. Paul was called by a Pillar of Fire (Acts 9:1-4) and his ministry was reaffirmed by the Holy Ghost in Act 13:2;

“As they ministered to the Lord, and fasted, the Holy Ghost said, separate me Barnabas and Saul for the work whereunto I have called them.”

The apostles were called by Jesus Christ Himself.

I wrote to Richard Gan reminding him that there can never be two restorers set on Matthew 17:11. He replied and said:

Quote Richard Gan: “If BB was the Restorer, as many called him, and that ALL THINGS WERE RESTORED, then why are there all these broken foundation of the many believing churches? Why are there all these confusion about the statements of BB?”

See, he forgets that he is carrying a container full of heresies confusing the believers and later he blows his own horn and asks, “Why is there confusion in the message?” That is silly, isn’t it?

 Quote Richard Gan: “Acts 5:15-16:2 Cor. 12:12. These texts do not conclusively prove that every one of the apostles demonstrated the power of healing and healed every sick person brought before them. (Foundation and the wall page 34). 
 
 In short Gan states that among the apostles, some were weak or powerless like him. He is a frustrated false apostle and the above scriptures expose his madness. 
 Richard Gan is very bitter, full of arrogance and hatred, and has no scripture to back him up. He depends on assumptions. He wants to hide behind some apostles whose miraculous signs and wonders were not recorded in the bible. We do not believe in fictitious stories or fables. Brethren, let me quote what Acts 5:12 –16 says: 
 “And by the hands of the apostles were many signs and wonders wrought among the people;” 
 (Apostles (plural). That was before Paul came in). 
 “…and they were all with one accord in Solomon’s porch. …14. And believers were the more added to the Lord, multitudes both of men and women.) Insomuch that they brought forth the sick into the streets, and laid them on beds and couches, that at the least the shadow of Peter passing by might overshadow some of them. There came also a multitude out of the cities round about unto Jerusalem, bringing sick folks, and them which were vexed with unclean spirits: and they were healed every one.”
 They were healed every one; that is what the bible says. Gan contradicts the scripture by saying not everyone of the apostles demonstrated the power of healing. Whom shall we believe, the bible or a false apostle? Gan’s speech of being an apostle must not just come with enticing words of man’s wisdom, but with demonstration of the Spirit and of Power. 

“And my speech and my preaching was not with enticing words of man’s wisdom, but demonstration of the Spirit and of Power.” (1 Corinthians 2:4).

 Now brethren do you understand why we call Richard Gan a false apostle? For the bible says, “… thou hast tried them which say they are apostles, and are not, and hast found them liars.” Richard Gan has enticing words of man’s wisdom but where power and demonstration of the Spirit is concerned, he has none, and even poorer if you take his teachings to the bible. A genuine apostle called by God must have the true word confirmed with power and the demonstration of the spirit.

We believe that there will be a five-fold ministry who are currently in preparation, and they will base their teachings on the bible and the revealed word that came by the messenger of this age. The five-fold will not come with their own message different from the teachings of Paul, Peter and the prophet. If the five-fold has to preach they will preach what was revealed by the prophets, for a prophet has the word of God. Anyone who claims to be an apostle must be based on the scriptures and the message. Any apostle who comes without power and demonstration of the Holy Spirit is a false apostle. And let me pronounce that any dreamer whose dream cannot be placed in the scriptures has an evil spirit. Any apostle who cannot be placed in II Corinthians 12:12, is a reject.

“Truly the signs of an apostle were wrought among you in all patience, in signs, and wonders, and mighty deeds.”

We need a genuine born again Apostle with an old fashion experience of the baptism of the Holy Ghost, fire-burning, who met Jesus Christ face to face. Richard Gan can never qualify, we therefore defy, refute expose his teachings and call them heresies.

Paul was not a weak and a pathetic apostle; Peter was not an immobilized apostle. Which apostle was ever called by a dream, which apostle came by local newspapers, which apostle came powerless? But this weak, powerless, helpless philosopher thinks he can explain the bible better than Elijah. He thinks he has the right to take away from Elijah’s message. Richard Gan, you are digging your own grave by attacking the message of Elijah. You will have no one to stand for you on that day. Repent or perish.

He wrote one time scaring me by saying that I had no fear for God’s servant. But who is God’s servant between him and Elijah? Elijah was born with a pillar of light hovering over him. The man clothed in white walked out of the light and said, “fear not, I am sent from the presence of Almighty God and above all he had THUS SAITH THE LORD. But this Richard Gan, firstly he read from the Seven Church Age book and came out of the Assemblies. Second, he claimed he was called by a dream to do the work of restoring the apostolic foundation. Third, his friend handpicked and told him that you are an apostle. Fourth, he got a confirmation for the name of his ministry, “Prophetic revelation” after reading an article that appeared in a local newspaper instead of the bible. Fifth, he turns against the message that made him to come out from the denomination prison. Sixth, he tells us in his original sin message that the two trees in the Garden of Eden were two laws governing the sexual reproductive organs which are in the midst of the garden of the human body. How can you respect such a man who has no fear for misplacing and giving false interpretation to the scripture and the message of Elijah?

Thanks to Trinidad, India and the Philippines for alerting Zambia, and the rest of the countries about this Singaporean born Chinese man sowing seeds of discrepancies.

“The Message Of William Branham Can Never Perfect The Bride”:

Quote Richard Gan: “God is using the Fivefold Ministry to perfect the Bride. The message of William Branham can never perfect the Bride. His message was a “decree” for us to separate ourselves from man-made creeds and dogmas, and to restore us to the Word. When we are in the Word, God will raise up the Walls around the City and perfect us within the City while keeping out all the religious trash. Amen.” (Foundation and the Wall paragraph 5).

Richard Gan does not believe that the message of Revelation 10:7 perfects the Bride, but one wonders what message then perfects the Bride because Malachi 4:5-6 preached what Paul and Peter preached. In the message, “Beyond the Curtain of Time 1961.”

Quote W.M.B.: …I ask, "Does Paul and Peter have to stand this judgment also? "The answer was, "Yes. …

BEYOND.THE.CURTAIN.OF.TIME_ JEFF.IN SUNDAY_ 61-0305

E-24 … I said, "I have preached what they preached. I did not divert from it to one side or the other. Where they baptized in the Name of Jesus, I did too. Where they taught the baptism in the Holy Spirit, I did too. Whatever they taught, I taught also.”

What messages will the five-fold preach which are contrary to what Paul, Peter and Brother Branham preached? To say that the message of Brother Branham can never perfect the Bride, is to throw out what the prophet said in the message, “Jehovah Jireh pt.3 03/08/60.”

Quote W.M.B.: “… I said, then if Paul makes it, I will too, because I preached the same thing he did, without compromising on one word…”

Richard Gan contradicts the message. He cannot explain the message that perfects the Bride. He argues without offering a solution. It means that he is a bluff; he has a bow without an arrow; he is a toothless lion.

Trying to refute that the message of William Branham can perfect the Bride is to disagree with the messages: “Beyond the curtain of time”, “Jehovah Jireh part 3”, “Absolute” and the rest of the messages.

We are mature and we have confirmed that the prophet preached what Paul preached. He preached the baptism in the Name of Jesus Christ. He preached the Baptism of the Holy Ghost; Holiness Standards. He never compromised and diverted from it.

Gan was in the Assemblies of God. He came out by reading the message of the prophet messenger: “Seven Church Ages”, and today he has turned around against the same message, which took him out of his denominational prison. He says we must get back to the bible. How could we go back to the bible without following a star that takes us back to the bible? God does not do anything without a sign. The shepherds faithfully followed the star and it led them to Jesus the word of God.

If he says the prophet died, I will tell him that the message is still alive. The message was the forerunner to the second coming of the Lord. The Shout is still working even now making others free from Ganism.

Gan’s spirit is that of Korah who came out of Egypt in prison after hearing the message of the messenger and on the way turned against Moses and his message. If God sent Korah and that group to hell; who is this Singaporean born Chinese to stand the judgment coming ahead because his reaction to the message is absolutely the same as that of Korah. This is why he awfully dislikes anyone quoting from the messages of the prophet.

When Abel by faith offered unto God a more excellent sacrifice than Cain, Cain became envious and, no doubt, Richard Gan is linked to Cain. After the prophet preached the more excellent message, Gan was told by his friend to go forth with a bag of intellectualism and sowed his heresies. Even false apostles are ordained to fulfill their part of sowing seeds of discrepancies. But a genuine apostle must come with the truth, confirmed by power and demonstration of the Holy Spirit.

I challenge Richard Gan to tell us the message that perfects the Bride apart from what Malachi 4:5-6 preached.

“Branhamites”:

This self-proclaimed Singaporean false apostle has called the wise servants following the star, which leads them to Christ, the Word, “Branhamites.” What would Richard Gan call those wise men in Matthew 2: 1-10 who came from the east of Jerusalem, after Jesus had been born in Bethlehem of Judea, following the star until it led them to Christ the Word? What name could have been given to those shepherds, if Richard Gan happened to live in their days? He would have called them starites. At first we just picked up the word Branhamite without a serious consideration on what it meant and the negative impact it had on the message, the messenger and the word of God. Richard Gan with his intellectual terms has brought reproach to the message and the messenger. We are not Branhamites; there is no such a thing as Branhamites.

Richard Gan is not a believer. He is a denominational preacher. This is why he has joined the denominational world in blaspheming the messenger. Had it been a denominational preacher calling the message believers “Branhamites”, we would not mind. But for someone who claims to believe the same prophet messenger, calling other believers “Branhamites”, it is really a shame and carnal minded. Rejecting the message is to reject the messenger because the message and the messenger is one and the same thing.

Quote W.M.B.: 66 we find out that when a man comes, sent from God, ordained of God with the truth THUS SAITH THE LORD, the message and the messenger are one and the same. Because he is sent to represent THUS SAITH THE LORD, Word by Word, so he and his message is the same. (Spiritual Food In Due Season 65-0718e).

Gan has contradicted the message and given an incorrect term to all those that have believed the message of the prophet Elijah. He is a descendant of Korah who thought he was smarter than Moses, but Korah with his intellectualism went to hell and he never entered the Promised Land. He rejected the prophet and he perished. It is reject and perish. Repent or perish.

Moses was a sign that led Israel and left them to Joshua (Jehovah God). The prophet and his message is another sign in our age that leads us to Jesus Christ. All those who spoke perverse things against Moses died right in the wilderness. So shall it be in this generation.

Since Richard Gan says the message of the prophet can never perfect the Bride, I would like to advise him, not to pretend but to be man enough and send the Seven Church Age book and the rest of the messages of the prophet to us the followers of Malachi 4:5-6.

Richard Gan, if you are an apostle coming with your own message of “perfection”, as you claim, surrender the messages of the prophet. Thank you Lord Jesus for E.O.D.H.

Tribute goes to Brother Augustine Kabengele the additional information. Thanks to Choma Spoken Word Ministry for the support and encouragement. Tribute to Brother Bruce and Ronald Watson, God bless you.

After this denouncement was sent out, denouncing Gan and his heresies; one of Gan’s supporters, Ambrose Omal, replied. He had not so much as one scripture to defend the heresies that were denounced. He chose rather to utter senseless railings against the author, saying that his statements is no different than Korah and Cain uttered, and that he should allow God to defend His own Word and disapprove Gan, and that one day he will pay for criticizing servants of God. He called the author, “Heretic number one”, and accused him of not having a humble spirit, lacking love and full of wrath and bitterness. The author’s response to him was as follows:

Dear Mr. Ambrose,

Christian greetings in the Name of our Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ. Your epistle is most welcome and I would like to take the liberty to commend you about your most positive letter of guidance, warning of bitterness and hate to have love and acceptance toward those that preach heresies and to let God fight for his Word. I would like to state that I am not beyond corrections and they are always welcomed from even the least in the Kingdom of God. However, any correction must be scriptural and message based, which I found wanting in your letter.

Mr. Omal got stumbled at the statement uttered in the attachment and he said I was not different from Korah and Cain. The precious soul did not specify the statements that pained him in his heart. He just said, “I read your attachment with pain in my heart”.

He uttered the ten points with personal feelings and selfish interest to drive away my attention from the issues that were raised in the manuscript and all he could do was to pity Mr. Gan… these were the statements: -

· Richard Gan is a Singaporean Born Chinese International Permanent Heretic.

· Gan’s Prophetic revelation is from the devil and direct from the abyss.

· Brethren prophetic revelation is the mechanism of Satan, which the devil is using to kill the message.

· Separate from this heretic and his heresies.

· Rather than a hypocrite who claims to believe the prophet and at the same time contradicts him.

· Unbelief will kill the unbeliever.

· What he is claiming are the deceit of his heart.

· He is a frustrated false apostle and the above scriptures expose his madness

· Richard Gan is a false apostle

Now if my language has no sign of a message believer how much more was the language of Jesus, John, Apostle Peter, Paul, Jude Titus and Brother Branham?...Jude 8,10,13

Mr. Ambrose, was Jude a message believer to be calling others dirty dreamers, brute beasts wandering stars even likening them to Balaam?  

Woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! For ye are like unto whited sepulchers, which indeed appear beautiful outward, but are within full of dead men’s bones, and of all uncleanness. … Ye serpents, ye generation of vipers, how can ye escape the damnation of hell? Mat 23:27, 33.

Mr. Ambrose does this language disturb you? Do you still feel pain in your heart after reading these scriptures?

…Mr. Ambrose you must be one of a PETTICOAT PREACHER for you to utter such damnation. You want to tell me that all these preachers who uttered strong statements were not quiet in spirit, humble, loving, and kind to one another? They referred to the heretics as whited sepulchers, serpents, generation of vipers, unruly, vain talkers, deceivers, always liars, evil beasts, slow bellies, being abominable, and disobedient, reprobate, filthy (dirty) dreamers and swine. Brother Branham even called some of them who are like you Mr. Ambrose, a bunch of idiots. Brother Bruce called Richard Gan a donkey. Are you telling me that all these preachers lacked a quiet spirit, humble, loving, and kind to one another?

...the statements of the above servants were more terrible than mine. Mr. Ambrose you are a dead hypocrite reading your Bible upside down. You must be a big compromiser of the message your country has ever produced.

Mr. Ambrose is asking a question that why don’t I allow God to do His work? Mr. Ambrose, why didn’t Apostle Paul allow God to do his work after he noticed the Galatians being moved from the truth to another gospel?

Why didn’t Jude allow God to do his work when he said, “Woe unto them! For they have gone in the way of Cain…to whom is reserved the blackness of darkness for ever”

Why didn’t Paul allow God to stop the mouth of some Jews who were unruly, vain talkers and deceivers like Mr. Ambrose is claiming? Paul advised Titus to rebuke them sharply that they may be sound in the faith not giving heed to Jewish fables.

Now Mr. Ambrose, tell me who disapproved Simon the sorcerer, was it God or Peter?   Maybe your Bible is far away from you. Peter was the one who disapproved the sorcerer. I am proving false your love gospel Mr. Ambrose, which says that I must wait for God to disapprove the Singaporean heretic, Richard Gan. God is in his Word; this is why Peter used the Word to disapprove Mr. Sorcerer. He did not wait for thunderstorms and lightning to come and condemn the sorcerer. Peter told the sorcerer to repent for his wickedness. The spirit and its anointing upon you are very much contrary to the Holy Spirit that was upon Peter, Jude, Paul and Brother Branham. Mr. Ambrose I call you to Repentance for your lies.

Mr. Ambrose with his Love gospel speaks like a Chairman of WCC…

Mr. Ambrose you have missed the mark. You cannot fit your love gospel into the scriptures… WMB said the early church made a great mistake by attending the Nicene Council in 325 AD. They compromised the Word of God and this is what you are advising me to do.

We don’t need sympathizers of Heretics in the message of the hour that have planned to kill the message. Apostle Paul said, for do I now persuade men, or God? or do I seek to please men? “For if I yet pleased men, I should not be the servant of Christ.” You want me to please you and your master Mr. Gan. I cannot do it. If you want to challenge me do it by the Bible and the message and not with mixed feelings. Shalom, Brother Joseph Nyangu.